The Age of Reason is a free Bible study/Christian history that shows how and why modern Christianity became apostate. |
View/save chapter in PDF format. |
Tradition has most
people thinking fornication is a synonym either for intercourse or for
intercourse by or with someone who is not married. And
obviously, since I wouldn’t be writing this book if Christianity today were
squared away, tradition has gotten it wrong…again. Fornication does
sometimes encompass sex, but the vast majority of fornication mentioned in the
Bible and committed by Christians has nothing to do with sex of any kind. In
this chapter I’ll show what fornication is and why it is such a damning
offense. (If
you are bound in the kind of Pharisaical morality-worshipping tradition that
makes the English language offensive to you, you might want to skip ahead now
and study chapter D35.)
The best definition of fornication is
“defrauding the brethren.” Since everything we do is supposed to help, to
edify, the brethren/church (whether it is showing mercy or rebuking or
shunning, etc.), we should never do
anything to hurt, weaken, or hinder church members from growing into mature,
combat-capable adults armed for our war. The word “hurt” doesn’t mean wayward
Christians shouldn’t suffer physical pain, emotional pain, embarrassment, or
other intentional and good side-effects of private and public discipline. The
reason God commands us to use corporal punishment to inflict pain, and to put
rebuking and shunning to good use, is He knows physical and emotional pain are
excellent motivators. Pain is good; no pain no gain (He 5:8). The idea that pain is bad or evil is unchristian and
anti-Bible and came from the Greek Epicureans, as we saw on page H5-2.
Christians today who have sat at the feet of Enlightened
theology think we should namby-pamby our thumb-sucking carnal babies. But we
should rebuke them soundly and not spare the rod (Pv 19:18) because of their crying. The
only no-no is defrauding the brethren. We should never, ever defraud the
brethren because that is fornication.
For any sin to be fornication it must defraud a
Christian or the church. 1 Co 6:8
says we should not defraud our Christian brethren.
And since only Christians are the body of Christ, 1 Co 6:18 shows fornication to be a sin against the church.
In other words, we are not to mess with the Lord’s anointed. Defrauding the
brethren covers a wide range of offenses, and unlawful sex is but one facet of
fornication. Fornication is a broad and very important topic. It is, after all,
the only valid reason for Christ to put a
Christian away! Fornication is what causes a Christian to fall from his
position under the scepter of grace to being under the Law of sin and death.
Fornication is the sin against the Holy Spirit; it is defrauding the body of Christ.
The Anglo-Saxon forefathers of the English
language used and passed on to us the English word fuck. Today many morality-worshipping Christians think the Bible
makes it a sin to say fuck rather
than “sinless” synonyms like intercourse, screw, ball, hump, and
rut. But this book is written for mature Christians who understand words
were made to serve us, not the other way around. They are merely tools used to
communicate. Those well-meaning-but-tradition-bound people who think it’s a sin
to use “the f word” instead of copulate
or defraud are doing just what Adam
and Eve did; they are sinning by partaking
of the tree that makes them think they know good and evil, and then, based on
that which is right in their own eyes, they usurp
God’s authority by inventing sins not found in the Bible. Not only are they
duplicating Adam and Eve’s sin (Ge 3:7,11), they are following in the footsteps of the
Pharisees with the old Mt 15:2 scam (Mk 7:1-9).
The English word fuck, like the Bible word fornicate,
encompasses much more than just sex. It means harm, confuse, defraud, as in “He really got fucked by a used car salesman.” That example has nothing to do with
sex, is typical of the way fuck is used, and is consistent with the Biblical
meaning of fornication. The word fornication can also be used in reference to sex but is not limited to that
application because, as I said, it has both a sexual and a non-sexual meaning.
It is ignorance and tradition that make many Christians think fornication
refers only to sex. I have chosen specific words, including fuck, and have
assigned limited meanings to them in order to help clear up the confusion over
what fornication is. Here is a list of the words that will be used and the
meanings assigned to them:
FORNICATION:
To FUCK one of God’s people. (Notice that
one of God’s people must be on the
receiving end. Notice also the sexual meaning may or may not apply to FORNICATION.)
FUCK:
To harm, confuse, hinder, cheat, betray, defraud. (Notice that nothing has been
said about God’s people. So if you
defraud a pagan, you only FUCKED him. But if you
defraud a fellow Christian, your FUCKING
is also FORNICATION. Note also that,
unlike in common usage, the sexual meaning in FUCK
has been removed for the purpose of illustration.)
SCREW:
To have sex with. (Notice that the sexual meaning is in SCREW.
Whether the SCREWING is lawful or unlawful
will be determined by the context.)
The following two sections will cover the sexual
aspects of FORNICATION.
We have already mentioned Le 18 in the section on incest. It establishes which people it is
unlawful for Christians to SCREW outside of wedlock –
other Christians. Therefore we’d expect any examples in the Bible of the sexual
kind of FORNICATION to involve Christians
– the very people declared to be sexually off limits in Le 18. Let’s look at
some examples:
● In
1 Co 5:1 the sin is FORNICATION; by SCREWING
(not marrying) his father’s wife in
violation of Le 18, he defrauded the
church.
● What did Ham do
wrong? He SCREWED his father’s wife (Ge 9:21,22,24; Le
18:8; 20:11; Dt 27:20). He was a FORNICATOR;
he defrauded the brethren.
● What did
Absalom do wrong? He SCREWED his father’s wives (2 Sa 16:21).
By SCREWING the very people Le 18 made it unlawful
to SCREW – God’s people – he
became a FORNICATOR; he defrauded the body of Christ.
● How did David
commit FORNICATION? He SCREWED
his neighbor’s wife (2 Sa 11:4) in violation of Le 18. He defrauded God’s people.
● When Sechem, a
pagan, had premarital sex with Dinah, a Christian girl, he was a FORNICATOR
because nobody messes with God’s
people (Ge 34:2,7). Sechem should have SCREWED
a pagan harlot instead (Ge 34:31); that would not have been FORNICATION
since God’s people wouldn’t have been
involved. (Note: When this episode happened, Le 18 had not been written. It
therefore illustrates God’s consistency; at no time has it been good to mess
with God’s people.)
---------- page
2 ----------
● When Amnon
ignored Le 18 and SCREWED his sister (2 Sa 13:12-14),
he was a FORNICATOR; he defrauded the church.
In each of these examples the SCREWING
was also FORNICATION because FORNICATION
is when somebody FUCKS the church. And although you can FUCK/defraud the church in many ways, the
above examples are restricted to sexual offenses.
All of the sins in the above section are the
result of violations of one of two fundamental Bible truths: First, all
unmarried Christian women are to remain virgins. Second, married Christian
women are to have sex only with their own husband. (The spiritual application
is very simple: We who are the espoused brides of Christ are not to allow
ourselves to be seduced, to be FUCKED, to be made impure, to be leavened by false doctrine from any source –
Christian or pagan. We must remain
chaste virgins.) For these reasons Christian women are perfect types or
pictures of the church.
Christian men, on the other hand, are not types
of the church. Christian men are types of the Lord, and, therefore, do not have
the same restrictions imposed upon them by the Bible. Christian men and women
are not equal in the Bible from the standpoint of office, position, rank,
responsibility, prerogative, or type. (If you are Enlightened you believe in
equality, which makes it necessary for you to reject all of this. And if you
call yourself a Christian you can’t come right out and say you reject the Bible
so you either wrest all of this or deny the inspiration and inerrancy of the
King James Bible – typically you’ll do both.) That is one reason the Bible does
not require Christian men to be virgins when they marry. This doctrinal
distinction between men and women has existed at least as long as the Bible
has, which is why derogatory terms to describe promiscuous women exist like
slut, tramp (in its sexual sense), tart, hussy, push-over, round-heeled, easy,
easy-mark, sure-thing, and floozy – but there are no similar words to describe
men.
One of the biggest reasons today’s Christianity
teaches that Christian men should be virgins when they marry, however, isn’t
just because of the Enlightened view that men and women should be equal, but
because the church today doesn’t understand sex, marriage, divorce, and
salvation. Because the church today wrongly and ignorantly rejects polygamy,
its doctrine that women and men are
required to be virgins when they marry makes sense to it. But because men are
allowed, as types of God, to have multiple wives, it would be contradictory
nonsense if the Bible required them to be premarital virgins. Let’s see if the
ensamples God put in His word for our edification support my contention that
today’s church doctrines are defrauding the church:
● Ju 16:1,4: Because Le 18 made it unlawful to SCREW
Christian girls out of wedlock, Samson, in order to avoid sin, went to the
Philistines to find prostitutes and girlfriends. He did not try to hide it;
even his parents knew about it. Their only concern was that he not marry a pagan (Ju 14:3).
● Did you ever wonder why it was necessary
for Boaz to issue a direct order to his Christian workers not to try to SCREW
Ruth the Moabite, while no such orders were necessary concerning his Hebrew
maidens in the fields (Ru 2:8,9)? It’s because unmarried
Christian men were allowed to SCREW unsaved girls but not
Christian girls. The workers might have thought Ruth as a Moabite was fair
game. Ruth was well aware of how Hebrews viewed Gentiles (Ru 2:10,13). For other examples of pagan
women who understood the difference between saints ‘n’ ain’ts
better than most of today’s Christians see Jn 4:9,27 and Mt 15:23-27.
● Le
19:20-22: Had the sin in this example been FORNICATION
it would have required the death
penalty (Dt 22:23-25).
The reason the death penalty for FORNICATION
did not apply in this case is, quite obviously, because this SCREWING
was not FORNICATION.
It would have been FORNICATION had the girl
been a Christian. How do we know she was a pagan? Because she was a bondmaid, a
slave, which Christians were not supposed to be (Le 25:39-46). There is a difference in
God’s eyes between His Christian women and unsaved women – even if today’s
Christianity doesn’t know about it.
● 1 Ki
3:16-28: Solomon neither rebuked nor punished the pagan harlots because
“the wisdom of God was in him, to do judgment” (v.28) and he understood the
difference between sinful FORNICATION and their
legitimate business of SCREWING.
● Ju 11:1,2:
Gilead had sons by his wife and he also had a son by a harlot. (If he stepped
out on his wife there would be Scriptural grounds to say his whoring was FORNICATION
against his wife. However, there is no indication that Gilead’s relations with
the prostitute took place during his marriage.) We know the harlot was a
stranger, a Gentile, because Christian girls were not allowed to be prostitutes
(Dt 23:17).
Gilead’s sons wrongly wanted to cut off the inheritance of their brother, Jephthah, because, while he was a half brother, he was also
half stranger. Notice the brothers did not
accuse Jephthah of being “born of FORNICATION”,
but of being the “son of a stranger.”
That’s because Gilead did not commit FORNICATION
when he SCREWED the unsaved whore.
Contrast this with the fact that when the Christian girl, Mary, got pregnant
out of wedlock it was assumed FORNICATION was involved (Jn 8:41; Mt 19:9; Mt 1:19). That’s
because, since she was a Christian, it didn’t matter whom she SCREWED;
saved or unsaved it was still FORNICATION. To add to
your understanding, notice the unsaved woman at the well in Jn 4 was never accused by Christ of sin – even though she’d SCREWED
several men who were not her husband. That’s because, first, no Christian was
involved, and, second, pagans are neither required nor expected to live by the
Bible. It was a different situation in Jn 8:11 when
Christ said the Christian woman who
was caught SCREWING a man not her husband
was guilty of sin.
● Ge 38:15-23:
Judah was a good Christian man who would never engage in the unlawful sex
defined in Le 18. So when he wanted sex he openly
went to a girl he thought was a pagan whore (because Christian girls were not
allowed to be whores according to Dt 23:17). Many people erroneously think
Judah was a hypocrite because, right after going out and SCREWING
a prostitute, he was going to have Tamar put to death for also having sex
outside of marriage (Ge 38:24). But Judah had not sinned, had
done nothing that offended anybody’s “morals” (because pagan morality was not a
part of Christian society), and didn’t have to put up with loudmouthed,
opinionated, Enlightened Scripture wresters and tradition-bound Bible rejecters
of the twenty-first century who thought the morality and ethics they never
studied and didn’t understand were probably
right and probably pleasing to God
even if they didn’t come from Him or His Rule Book. (It’s not a sin to write an
occasional run-on sentence, is it? And if it is, could we properly invoke
expediency to make run-on sentences lawful as long as it’s for the good of the
church?!) Anyway, all of the above is why Judah’s whoring was done openly and
without shame or fear that God or man would disapprove. Even Tamar knew it was
not sinful for Judah to pick up a prostitute…because he was a widower
(Ge 38:12). That means he was not
violating any restrictions placed on married Christian men such as Pv 5:3,5,8,15,18,19 and Mt 5:27,28. When Tamar decided to dress
up like a prostitute it certainly wasn’t because she was afraid a good
Christian like Judah would reject her offer as sinful – what a stupid strategy
that would be! No, she knew there was a long list of things in her favor: Judah
was a widower; the SCREWING would not be
sinful in general or FORNICATION in particular;
with her body she figured she would be as alluring to Judah as Abishag was supposed to be to David (1 Ki 1:1-4); it was common and legitimate
for pagan prostitutes to cater to Christian men, so Tamar ran no risk of being
run out of town as an undesirable element while she waited for Judah to come
along; and she knew Judah could afford the service. Unless you allow tradition
to make the word of God of none effect you’ll see Judah did nothing wrong. But
it was a different story when a Christian woman went whoring; the death penalty
was called for and was supported by all good Christians. (Therefore, as
Christ’s women we are whoring whenever we are not faithful in our Christian
walk.) Modern Christians whose traditional conservative morals cause them to
think Judah was guilty of fornication and to think his son, Pharez,
was born of fornication don’t realize that if they are correct it means our
Lord was born of fornication: When Judah SCREWED
Tamar he was contributing to the ancestry of the Lord Jesus Christ (Ge 38:29; Ru 4:12,18-22; Mt 1:3; Lk 3:33). I
say again, Judah was not sinning and the Lord was not born of the
fornication that modern Christian tradition and morality say He was. Modern
Christians do err by not knowing the Scriptures, by letting their religious
traditions make the word of God of none effect, and by making the Pharisees in Jn 8:41 correct
when they implied Christ was born of fornication. Modern Christianity is
inexcusably apostate.
---------- page
3 ----------
Some well-meaning Christians will argue that
places like Pv 7 prohibit
unmarried Christians from consorting with prostitutes. While we’re dealing with
this it might be quicker if we add the fact that these same people say Pv 20:1 and 23:20,21,27-34
prohibit Christians from drinking intoxicating liquor such as beer, whiskey,
and wine. But these are just the old Mt
15:2 scams of the Pharisees – creating sins not in the Bible by allowing
the moral traditions of men to make the word of God of none effect – and are
easily dealt with. When you read the above verses, note that they are warnings and not prohibitions. Since tradition is a very powerful, influential, and
persuasive force we must be careful when we address these issues. For example,
I could never win a debate on these issues if we stayed in the three proverbs
above. Why? Because tradition makes us think those warnings are or should be prohibitions…until we put things into perspective
with the rest of the Bible:
● Pv 23:2,20,21 are warnings
about eating food. But it’s still permissible to eat food.
● In the Old Testament
God’s people were not merely warned
about the dangers of marrying pagans; it was recommended that they not do it. But they were still permitted to
do so.
● In the New Testament
we are warned about the dangers of
marrying anyone, Christian or pagan (1 Co 7:32-35). In fact, it is recommended
that we not marry at all (1 Co 7:1,7,8)!
But we are still permitted to do so.
Why are we warned
about things that are lawful such as
alcohol, Christian wives, prostitutes, Christian husbands, food, and unsaved
spouses, to name just a few? Because as Christian warriors
who are supposed to be in control of our bodies we should be aware of the lusts
and distractions that can get in our way. Different people have problems
with different things. The wise head will take all of this into account when
handling and controlling whatever weakness his body may have. Don’t you know
what fasting is all about? It’s about
learning, practicing, and exercising mastery over your body in the area of the
most powerful and most frequently occurring lust you experience. There’s a
saying in naval warfare, “Pick out the biggest and commence firing!” That’s
what fasting is all about: Food is our biggest lust. When you fast you should
be learning to apply the self-control you are exercising over an activity that
is both legitimate and necessary for physical life to everything else in life.
That’s how you learn to rule well your own body so you can not only just say
no! to your body at various times as is appropriate,
but also that your well-disciplined body will instantly obey you even unto death! That is, after all, the kind of
disciplined servant you are striving to be for the Lord, isn’t it? Isn’t it?
When the modern church incorporated morality and
tradition and allowed them to redefine fornication, it found it didn’t know
what to do with God’s New Testament advice to not marry at all. So it combined 1 Co 7:9 (covered in chapter D34, Lust) with its new definition of
fornication as any sex outside of wedlock
in order to conclude most Christians have problems “containing” simply because
everyone that pisseth against a wall has a normal
desire to have sex. Those misunderstandings made God’s advice that we not marry
at all of none effect: How, they wondered, could a man have lawful sex if he
weren’t married? So the modern apostate church ignores the word of God, encourages
marriage (!), fills our pews with the pagan fruit of our loins, and thereby
helps spread the carnal leaven of Reason.
If today’s church knew the Bible, it would advise
its pewsters to remain single like Paul. In that way
our modern warriors could utilize the massive
amounts of time they spend caring for spouses and unsaved children by learning
the Bible and helping the church. And if a Christian bachelor wanted sexual
relations, he could follow the Bible’s examples by finding an unsaved
girlfriend like Samson did (a relationship that might be time-consuming and
problematic), or by finding a prostitute (in areas where it is legal) like
Judah did (a non-relationship that is neither time-consuming nor problematic).
Sex drive quickly satisfied, he could then immediately
get back to studying the Bible, edifying the church, and furthering the cause
of Christ – rather than homeschooling his children, taking his kids to a baseball
game, helping his wife select new drapes, cleaning the charcoal grill for the
picnic with his in-laws, or visiting his grandchildren (2 Ti 2:4; 1 Co 7:28,29,32,33).
So be careful with your doctrine lest you
condemn the guiltless. And stop telling people it’s a sin to marry just because
we are warned in Scripture about the
potential problems inherent with having a spouse. The same goes for other
things we are warned about such as eating, drinking, and lawful sexual activity
by Christian bachelors.
We’ve seen that sexually SCREWING
Christians outside of wedlock is FORNICATION.
And we’ve seen when sexual SCREWING outside of
wedlock is not a sin. Now we shall leave the realm of sex and see when
non-sexual FUCKING is FORNICATION.
Let’s review the definition of FORNICATION
in 1 Th 4:1-9.
V.1 establishes the topic as the Christian walk. V.3 says don’t FORNICATE.
V.6 says don’t defraud the brethren.
V.9 says the opposite of FORNICATION is brotherly
love. Now, while it is quite possible the passage may be referring to the
sexual facet of FORNICATION, we are in this
section leaving the sexual part behind and focusing on the fact that FORNICATION
is defrauding the brethren, or, for
our purposes here, FUCKING the brethren. Let’s
look at some examples in Scripture:
● 1
Co 10:8: Here the sin of FORNICATION has nothing to
do with sex. Why? Because the whoredom
of Nu 25:1, which is called FORNICATION
in 1 Co 10:8, is the false religion of Baalpeor (Nu 25:2,3). It is also properly called whoredom, not because it has anything to
do with sex, but because God’s bride is a whore if she does not keep herself
pure by learning and doing her Husband’s will and nothing but His will. When a
member of the body of Christ, the temple of God, becomes leavened by knowingly or unknowingly (Mt 15:14; 2 Co 11:2,3) accepting and
incorporating pagan philosophy or religion, that leavened member is a serious threat to the purity of the
church (Mt 16:6,11,12; Ga 5:9; 1 Co 6:15-20). That is how Christians
non-sexually FUCK the church. That is FORNICATION.
---------- page
4 ----------
From a doctrinal standpoint look at a beautiful
aspect of fornication and putting away that reveals the two to be brilliant
self-defense or self-preservation mechanisms for the church: First, notice very
carefully that in order to prevail against the church the Devil can’t just
launch a frontal attack and kill us all; he must destroy us from within (Mt 12:25-31) like he tried to do with
Balaam and the whoredom of Peor. Satan must use fifth
column warfare because killing the physical old man does him no good. He must
seduce our new man into being doctrinally leavened so we can damn the
rest of the church from within!
Consider that as you read what doctrinal leaven does to the church and who spreads
it in Mt 23:13,15
and 15:14. Now apply it to Mt 10:36
and understand this: Unsaved people have never
been a threat to the church and they have never
defeated us. All of our defeats have come
from within when one member leavens the whole lump (Josh 7:11,20). We are no longer supposed
to take care of the problem in a Josh
7:25 way, but we are supposed to rebuke, shun, exercise church
discipline, and use corporal punishment. When we don’t do that we FUCK
that wayward brother as well as the church – which makes us guilty of FORNICATION
(Ezek 3:18b). But God’s beautiful
planning comes to the rescue: FORNICATION is legal
grounds for putting away a wife! If God’s house is divided against itself
(meaning Christians are doctrinally FUCKING
other Christians and pumping them full of wicked seed/leaven), God will put
them away and damn them to hell in order to save the rest of the church (1 Co 3:17 – remember what we learned
about the meaning of “destroy”); because you
don’t FUCK with God’s people (Mk
9:42-50).
● Ezek
3:18: Ezekiel was told to warn God’s
people that they had better repent. If Ezekiel had FUCKED
his brethren by not warning them, they would still die in their iniquity, but
God would charge Ezekiel with the sin of FUCKING
the church – FORNICATION.
● The FORNICATION
in 2 Ch 21:11 has nothing to do with
SCREWING
God’s people but everything to do with FUCKING
God’s people.
● Judas Iscariot went to hell because,
instead of greeting Christ with the required holy kiss,
he committed FORNICATION.
He defrauded the church, and that’s the only sin that is legal grounds for
putting away and damning a wife. Christ gave His life for the welfare of the
church and we are to do the same (Jn 3:16; 1 Jn 3:16) because that’s
the only thing that matters (Ec 12:8-14). Helping the church is the opposite of FORNICATION.
The reason we are commanded to be charitable to strangers is to keep us from
accidentally defrauding angels unawares – because saints are angels. Mt 25:31-46 shows how important it is
to avoid defrauding the brethren: The Lord takes it very, very personally!
Avoiding FORNICATION is an important,
lifelong job. In fact, there is no such thing as neutrality; either you’re
helping the church, or you’re defrauding it (Mt 12:30; Re 3:15,16).
● This one is
worth repeating because it is a big problem today: The greatly respected,
Bible-preaching, soul-winning Pharisees were unknowingly committing FORNICATION
by teaching leavened doctrine. Their duped pewsters
went to hell and the PHUCKING Pharisees were
right behind them (Mt 23:13,15) because God required
the pewsters’ blood at their hands. Slothful
Christians who do not study the word to find the truth will unknowingly FUCK
themselves with their inexcusable ignorance/disobedience,
and FUCK the church by being
incapable of helping it. They will then experience shocked terror when they see
Christ take their FORNICATION very, very personally
– after all, they didn’t think all of this was that big of a deal. This is a
works religion in which work is mandatory, not optional. As individuals you and
I are not important, and our physical lives are not important because we shall
die anyway. What is important is the body to which we are attached, the church.
Satan is dedicated to the leavening of the church. As individual members whose
everlasting future is tied to the fate of our church, we are to devote
ourselves to the welfare of the church (1
Co 10:24; Jn 21:15-17).
● Blasphemy
against the Holy Ghost is FORNICATION
(Mt 12:24-37).
Our first clue is when Christ tells us FORNICATION
is the only sin for which putting
away is legal (Mt 19:9). And then here in v.31 we learn that blasphemy against
the Holy Ghost is the only sin that
won’t be forgiven. That makes us think they are the same. Another thing that makes
us think they are the same is this entire passage is
dealing with FORNICATION: The Pharisees start
out by saying Christ is working for the Prince of Darkness (v.24). Christ
responds by saying any kingdom whose members FUCK
each other will fall (v.25). Then He says something interesting. He says Satan,
the King of Darkness, has a kingdom
(v.26). There are only two possibilities in the Bible, the Kingdom of God (KOG)
and the Kingdom of Heaven (KOH). And then Christ tells us to whom those
kingdoms belong (v.28) by saying He represents the KOG. That
means the other kingdom, the KOH, is ruled by Satan. Thus we learn from
Christ that today’s Pharisees who think the KOG and the KOH are the same are phull of it. He then says those in His kingdom (such as the
Pharisees to whom He is speaking) who aren’t working with Him (even if they’re
passive or neutral) are actively against Him (v.30). He is warning the
Pharisees not to FUCK the KOG He
represents. Then in the next two verses He says all kinds of sins, including
blaspheming Him, will be forgiven, but defrauding the Holy Ghost, whose job
is to edify the church (Jn 14), will lead
to damnation. He then goes on to say the wicked can be spotted by evaluating
their fruit.
The damnable sin of blasphemy against the Holy Ghost
is not any one specific sin, and it can be different sins for different people.
But it will always involve FUCKING the church in some
way. Because many denominations don’t understand this they usually teach that
the sin of blasphemy against the Holy Ghost is
a single specific sin, and they choose something consistent with one of their
main denominational doctrines. For example, adherents of eternal security and
the immortality of the unregenerate soul say this damnable sin is simply never
getting born again via the “sinner’s prayer”. And those who speak gibberish
think anyone who says they are speaking gibberish instead of some angelic
language caused by the Holy Ghost is committing this damning blasphemy. Many
also think it is an unpardonable sin that instantly and irrevocably damns when
first committed. But it’s actually like the straw that breaks the camel’s back;
it’s when a patient, merciful, and loving Father finally reaches the point that
He gives up on an incorrigible saint.
Christianity is a family growth process. It is
not at all unusual for babes in Christ to frequently sin because of their
Natural carnality, understandable ignorance of the Scriptures, and lack of
discipline. As they gain a little knowledge they try to act “big” and think they’re
smarter than they really are – like teenagers. These teens are prone to
unknowingly FORNICATE or blaspheme against
the Holy Ghost for several reasons: They are hot-blooded, they want to conform
to the peer pressure of their denomination, and they confuse their
denominational loyalty with being a defender of the faith by adopting a “my
denomination can beat up your denomination” approach to doctrine.
---------- page
5 ----------
Ideally a young Christian should mature in the
word so the Bible becomes his source of truth instead of his
denomination. In that way, when he hears something doctrinally new or different
he won’t accept or reject it based on the handful of verses his denomination
told him were irrefutable proofs, or worse, without any verses simply because
he is blindly following his denominational Pharisee. A mature Christian, for
example, would respond to a first hearing of, “Ec 3
says man hath no preeminence above a beast”, with, “Hmm...I’ve never really
paid attention to that before. Why do you think it means exactly what it says?”
He then has communion with the person who showed it to him to find out if there
is any supporting Scripture, and he mentally resolves to check out the topic
during his daily Bible study. This is because he is a mature believer whose
loyalty and submission is not to his church’s doctrine, but to the word of God.
The immature Christian’s response to Ec 3, on the other hand, will predictably and boringly
involve the world (1 Jn 4:5)
rather than the word: “Oh, come on! What
about the fact that man has an opposable thumb, and can read, and goes indoors
when he has to take a...?” Or perhaps he’ll say, “Boy,
is that weird! What are you, a JW or something?” And he will drag the
conversation away from what the Bible
says (a process of rejection that must be outgrown because it is another
straw on “Father Camel’s” back) into the Devil’s realm of science, majority
opinion, morals, church tradition, etc., so that you find yourself thinking he
doesn’t have the sense God gave a dumb ass (2 Pe 2:16).
Denominations are good at producing these
adolescents and making sure they never mature. This is accomplished through
various means, the most exalted of which is Bible college (compare Ac 22:3 and Ph 3:4-6 with Ph 3:8; Ga 1:16-18; Jn 14:26;
Mt 16:17; Lk 10:39-42; 1 Co 4:6). The fact is no
denomination will hire a guy who flunked out of Bible college.
And no church will hire a guy unless the Bible school he graduated from is
approved by its denomination because they know from personal experience that in
order to pass with at least a D- he must have marked the exams with the answers
the denomination approves of – no matter what the Bible says. In that way these
Pharisees are assured that the guy who passed
is a flunky like they are, and that
he is – unlike every saint in the Bible – not likely to resist tradition.
This organizational immaturity is the most
common way Christians are PHUCKED. The Lord said,
“Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he [the Father!] taketh away” to “cast them into
the fire, and they are burned” (Jn 15:1,2,6). The
point is Christians who remain immature
(don’t bear fruit) end up FUCKING the church either
actively or passively because if we don’t gather with Him, we’re against Him.
(Gather is a verb; it is work.)
Our Father in heaven doesn’t like immaturity but it is a part of the growth process – the
part He requires us to leave behind. Immaturity is expected in young
Christians; they will defraud the church more than once. But this FORNICATION/blasphemy
against the Holy Ghost is not a one-time sin. Remember, when King David FORNICATED
he was fearful that he might lose the Holy Ghost (Ps 51:11) because he understood the proper grounds for putting away
a wife, but his sin turned out not to be the last straw. Any Christian,
however, who over a period of time
does not mature, bear fruit, and gather with Christ is cut off from the Family
(Dt 21:18-21; Nu 14:11,12)
as an immature member or branch that offends or defrauds, and is cast into the
fire and burned lest his FORNICATION cause the rest
of the Body to be cast into hell also (Mt
18:6-9). This blasphemy against the Holy Ghost/FORNICATION
is called resisting the Holy Ghost in
Ac 7:51. And since the purpose of
the Holy Ghost is to teach us to live in accordance with the word of God (Jn 14:15-26), the Holy Ghost is
blasphemed and the church is defrauded when we fail to live by the word of God
by, as we saw in Ac 7:51, either stiffening our necks or not getting rid of the
carnal flesh that can block our spiritual eyes, ears, and hearts from receiving
the necessary nourishment from the Vine. To verify that God thinks blasphemy is anything that isn’t in
accordance with the correct doctrine the Holy Ghost is trying to teach us, read
Ti 1:9,13; 2:1,5,10.
This blasphemy against the Holy Ghost causes God
to inflict pain as punishment (2 Sa 12:9-11; He 12:5-17) in an effort to get His child to
repent and mature. But if the Christian over
time proves to be an incorrigible reprobate, he is no longer spanked – he
is executed by stoning, which is a type of the second death in the lake of
fire.
There is an important lesson in this for those
slothful brethren who want to abuse expediency by slacking off on their Bible
study, by keeping the “golden rule,” and by being full of the type of modern
“Christian love” that makes me want to puke: If their doctrine isn’t sound they
are not good Christians, they are
blasphemous FORNICATORS on their way to a
putting away/damnation they will think is unfair.
Because all of 1 Co 6 has to do with FORNICATION,
I think it’s profitable to take a closer look at it:
Vv.1-8:
Here the problem is defined: Christians are FUCKING
each other. Defrauding the church is so bad we should even practice v.7b (which
is very similar to Ro 15:1) when
necessary. By appealing to our sense of brotherly love this passage is using
the carrot (rather than the stick) approach.
Vv.9,10: Here the stick (rather than the carrot)
is used with the warning, “Don’t you know that unrighteous Christians (the wicked) will lose their inheritance?”
And then defrauding is included in a list of other sins that usually get more
attention.
Vv.11,12: Here comes the conceptually harder
point to understand: Because v.9 indirectly called these FUCKERS
unrighteous, which could confuse some
into thinking it was referring to the unsaved,
v.11 acknowledges that these FUCKING Christians have
indeed been washed and sanctified by the Holy Spirit in the name of the Lord
Jesus. And because they are saved and
are no longer under the law v.12 says, “Yes, I know all things are lawful for
Christians, but not all things are expedient.”
And then, because God knows it will be difficult for some to understand why that is true as well as how it can be true, He devotes the rest
of chapter 6 to explaining it.
V.13:
“The church is not meant to FUCK itself; it is
supposed to be one with the Lord.”
V.15:
“Don’t you know that all of you collectively are Christ’s body? Therefore, because of what leaven does, and
because of Le 21:7,9,13,14, as well
as Hag 2:12-14, if some member of
the church is a harlot like Aiken was at Ai, all members become harlots (unless and until the leaven is
removed). Would you like it if that were to happen? Of course
not.”
V.16:
“What? You didn’t know sex, marriage, and divorce are important and should be
applied to this subject!? For two, saith the Bible,
shall be one flesh.”
V.17:
“Did I say flesh? Because we
Christians have two bodies, let me
clarify that by reminding you it’s our spirit
bodies that are joined (at the marriage supper) to the Lord. Our spirit
bodies are the church, not our physical bodies.”
V.18:
“So, in order to avoid the disinheritance I mentioned in verses 9 and 10, don’t
FUCK
the church. Here’s why that is conceptually correct and important to that
lawful/expedient stuff: Every non-fornication
sin a Christian commits has no affect on,
or is outside of, the spirit body of
the church because by definition
those sins do not affect/defraud the church; on the other hand a Christian who
commits FORNICATION is by definition hurting his own church
body from within.”
---------- page
6 ----------
V.19,20: “What? You still haven’t figured out
your spirit body is the temple of the
Holy Ghost, that is, the body that was born of God? And don’t you know your physical body was purchased by Christ’s substitutionary physical
death? Therefore glorify God with both
of your bodies.”
If you’re having any trouble understanding the
topic of FORNICATION and how it relates to
expediency in 1 Co 6 you’re in luck because all of 1 Co 10 is a repeat of 1 Co 6 for those who didn’t get it the first
time. It deals with Old Testament saints who were spiritually born of Christ
(just like the FUCKERS in Corinth), but fell
from grace because of FORNICATION. And we are
warned (stick, not the carrot) to take heed lest we, too, fall, because we
cannot be part of the Lord’s (marriage supper) table if we are part whore. Yes,
all things are lawful for me, however our focus is not to be on self but rather on the welfare of the
church. Everything is done to glorify God. That
is expediency, which is Mk 12:29-34; Mt
12:7, which is also the true message of the Old Testament (Mt 22:36-40; 12:1-8).
In the first two sections we looked at when SCREWING
was and was not FORNICATION. Those were sexual
meanings. In the third section we saw examples when non-sexual FUCKING
was FORNICATION. In this section we’ll continue with
non-sexual FUCKING, but we’ll
look at places in the Bible where Christians FUCKED/defrauded
the unsaved and it was not a sin.
● Dt 23:19,20: This concerns usury, and although usury is a sin
among Christians, here we find it is all right to charge unbelievers for their use of our money and goods. Why? Because
unbelievers exist to serve God’s people – that is their reason for being.
● When God’s people were about to leave
Egypt, God told them to “borrow” (Ex
11:1-3) gold and silver jewelry from the unsaved even though there was
never any intention to give it back (Ex
3:20-22; 12:35,36). The Bible teaches that God and
His people knowingly and deliberately spoiled the unsaved. (The church today
thinks God and His people were spoiling their own “testimony” as well! Whoa!
Did I just say the modern church thinks?
Actually, the church doesn’t take the Bible seriously enough to think about and
care when Scripture contradicts traditional moral values.) There is a
difference between God’s people who are intended to rule the world, and the
world’s people who are intended to serve.
Do these examples mean we have a license to
steal from the unsaved? No. God’s people only ignored the Commandments
forbidding lying and stealing in order to spoil pagans when the Godly interests
of the church were furthered. But it does mean we may charge interest fees to
pagans as long as those fees are legal according to pagan society’s laws, but
we may not do so to fellow Christians. The real value of these examples is in
the increased understanding they give us about the law and expediency.
They also help show how “ethics” and “morality”
are utter nonsense from a Christian viewpoint, at least to those unenlightened
(that means good) Christians to whom sola Scriptura is more than just a
hypocritical and empty anti-Catholic slogan. It was, for example, unethical and
immoral for thousands of Christians to lie to the Egyptians about “borrowing”
their valuables. Why do ethics and morality contradict the Bible and make God
“wrong” to tell those Christians to do “wrong”? Because ethics and morality are
pagan, and the unsaved Naturally don’t want God’s people spoiling them! So they got
rid of the difference between
Christians and dogs by basing ethics and morality on equality and the carnal mind in
order to pretend temporary and insignificant unregenerate mortals are somehow
our equals. Enlightened Christians who run around saying,
“What Would Jesus Do?” use ethics, morality, and Reason instead of the Bible,
and agree with the unregenerate about the “borrowing” incident and try to
explain it away. If you have a problem with that it reveals that you’re
not a Christian and can’t understand
this stuff, or, if you are a Christian: 1) You haven’t been studying this book
by looking up and applying the Scripture; 2) You go to men to find doctrine
that is acceptable with the conservative majority or with denominational
tradition; 3) You think unregenerate man has at least some preeminence above
beasts; 4) You think the unsaved are going to hell; 5) You think you’re going
to heaven; 6) You’ve been reading this book lightly and quickly because
something in your makeup so identifies with the carnal self-evidence of
tradition that you can’t bring yourself to seriously search the Scriptures to
see if these things be so because you don’t think they are and because the Bible
isn’t really your authority; 7) You’re bothered by the fact that I have a
fondness for run-on sentences; 8) You’re an Enlightened Christian and damned
proud of it; 9) You’re offended by both my tone and my Scriptural language; 10)
Because you never circumcised the carnal flesh covering your eyes and ears
you’ve been blind and deaf to the fact that the Bible reveals those who taught
you the “Bible” to be blind leaders who have made you twofold more the child of
hell than they are; 11) You think God likes it when you do what you think is
right and good; 12) You think democracy is godly and totalitarianism is
Satanic; 13) You think God’s kingdom will or should be a republic; 14) You
think you’ll rule and reign with Christ as a public servant in a level society.
● My final
example of legally defrauding pagans is the topic of slavery, but I’ll deal
with it in the next chapter.
We have seen in the last several chapters that
modern Christianity in these dark last days before the Second Coming is no
different from the Christianity of the dark days before the First Coming: We’ve
got a bunch of tradition-bound Pharisees with nice “Christian” personalities
who have no idea what they are doing!
They have emphasized soul winning and gotten an awful lot of people “saved.”
Their churches are full of wonderful, moral, hymn-singing families who are following them to hell! They
don’t know their doctrine is really leaven. And they
have four things showing them they are “correct”: 1) Tradition: They have no
idea the historical events of the first half of this book gradually leavened
our Christian ancestors and changed the truth of God into a lie. 2) Ethics and
morality: Everything in and around their lives that combines to form their
whole system of thought and being, whether it be religious doctrine, government
and law, the economic system, social and family structure, and even Bible study, is poisoned because it is all based on the very pagan philosophy we were warned about in
the Bible! 3) Knowledge of good and evil: We are all cursed with the same
carnal mind that invented the modern social and religious structure all
Enlightened Christians accept, believe, and hold dear and sacred. That Natural
Reason has Enlightened Christians captive, even though they think they are
free. 4) Authority: They are their own authorities who respect and value their
own opinions.
For the reasons covered in this book, the church
is destroying itself with its own doctrine. And while the church thinks it is
defending itself from the onslaughts of the Devil by fighting queers, commies,
drunks, dictators, flag burners, and liberal politicians, it is being FUCKED
from within in violation of the broader, non-sexual application of Le 18.